Menu


AUDIO – Tech analyst Rob Enderle talks Apple, Tim Cook, iPad 3 and Foxconn troubles

By Mark Zetter

  Click here to listen.

Analyst Rob Enderle with the Enderle Group.

 

Zetter: Hello, I’m Mark Zetter with Venture Outsource. We’re talking with Rob Enderle, analyst with the Enderle Group based in Silicon Valley.

Before we begin our conversation, if someone in our audience has suggestions for future conversation topics or feels there is a particular person they think would be well-suited for an upcoming conversation, you can email us your comments or suggestions at insight[at]ventureoutsource[dot]com.

So, let’s get started.

Rob, you’ve been heralded by ZDNet as one of the ten best techies to follow on Twitter. What are your thoughts about that?

Enderle: Well, it’s nice of them to do that. It’s always nice to be recognized, and I do stay fairly active on Twitter and try not to drive people nuts. So, it’s just great that they’ve identified me in that rarified list of tweeters. So, at least they think of me as a rarified tweeter and not a rarified twit.

Zetter: [Laughing]

Enderle: I’m glad for that.

Zetter: We’re talking about Apple, and a number of things in the news lately regarding the company. What are your thoughts about some of the leading stories in today’s headlines whether it’s the Apple browser and Google, or…

Why don’t we start there with recent reporting going on regarding Apple and Google and the browser.

Enderle: Well, first on that, the Wall Street Journal did an investigation and found out that [Google] had penetrated the security surrounding, Safari and had bypassed user settings and not – its user settings because the browser defaults as being secure, arguably more secure than what most other browsers do when they first install.

And Google decided that they would go in and bypass those settings and started tracking the Apple users without the permission of those Apple users. And did so after they had already signed a content decree with the FDC with regard to privacy.

And a content decree that a number of folks had indicated was – I mean simply didn’t go far enough. I guess this was Google’s way of emphasizing the fact that the content decree didn’t go far enough, and end result was Apple customers, had been tracked evidently for some time.

And then afterward, when this was pointed out, they turned off their process and ceased doing it, which I think would indicate that they were well aware that they were doing something wrong even though they argued at the time they were caught that they were not trying to get around Apple’s closed nature. And, do what they thought should’ve been done, which I guess is make sure that they’d benefit from the information that they’d collection from Apple users.

It’s like somebody getting caught after stealing from somebody and then saying, “But had I did it for the global good because the person I stole from was such a miserly fellow.”

It’s kind of a Robin Hood – instead of stealing from the rich and giving to the poor, you’re stealing from the rich and keeping it.

So the end result was – is that it’s been getting a lot of play, and of course today it turns out that they’ve done pretty much the same thing to the Microsoft browser’s as well, which resulted in the cease and desist order from Microsoft.

So, hey, if you’re gonna go around pissin’ people off why not go after both Apple and Microsoft on the same day. Few people have that kind of strength in their commitment.

Zetter: So looking at Apple, there have been some changes with Steve Jobs’ passing. What are your thoughts about the ability for Apple’s technology roadmap or future capabilities to execute against the same type of quality under Tim Cook compared to when Steve Jobs was there regarding innovation challenges, the makeup of the executive team.

What are your general thoughts on the company today?

Enderle: Well, the interesting thing is to really understand the role that Steve Jobs played. He wasn’t the innovation center of Apple by any stretch of the imagination. He took credit for a lot of stuff, but other people came up with the iPod, other people championed and drove through the iPhone.

Clearly, he was anti-tablet early the last decade, and you’ve got to believe the iPad was probably somebody else’s idea as well.

The trick with getting something through Steve Jobs was to convince him it was his idea so he would champion it, in which case he would husband it through the process.

 

“Tim Cook is not a product guy. He also doesn’t have somebody that can pitch a product like Steve Jobs did. Tim Cook doesn’t even like getting up in front of an audience.”

— Rob Enderle

 

And that was really his benefit. He could take something with largely an idea that somebody else came up with, and he could take it through to its full potential. He would assure that it was done right. And not belittling Steve. This is actually a very rare skill.

I mean, anybody can come up with an idea. We’ve certainly seen Microsoft, for instance, generate tons and tons of ideas the last decade – most of which didn’t go anyplace – from the Zune to their media center PC to the portable media player, to their origami tablet to some things people don’t even remember.

For Apple, they had very few failures.

Pretty much everything was a success and that success was largely driven by the fact that Steve Jobs husbanded the product. He made sure that engineering and design got along; that neither side was overtly overcome, that the product met certain critical standards.

And he basically was the focus group inside the company in terms of how something should be built.

In fact, you could see his influence when you compared products like the iPad, which he really supported, and Apple TV. He’d never really understood – he never really understood or liked television, and Apple TV didn’t receive his full support.

And, of course, Apple TV, while it’s arguably the best product in its class, it didn’t do particularly well.

And so, without Steve Jobs, Apple has lost its primary product focus – kind of its quality core. Also, it has lost its principle pitchman because the other thing that Steve Jobs did is he could get up in front of an audience and he could convince us of something that we otherwise wouldn’t buy.

I mean, let’s take the iPhone, for instance. It’s basically a direct copy of the LG Prada. The LG Prada didn’t sell particularly well.

The iPhone, of course, has had all kinds of sale records. Almost an identical product, the iPhone was better crafted. In other words, better finished. But, it was also better presented even though the LG used the famous Prada brand.

LG didn’t really promote it all that much, and in fact, the people here in the U.S. probably never even saw it. Apple put the full strength of Apple marketing behind the iPhone, pieced it out, got people excited and then it became – it went from a form factor people just wouldn’t buy because, before that, some people were not buying that class of phone in any real volume no matter who made it – to the one that’s set the standard for all other phones.

That was the magic of the Steve Jobs pitch, and right now Apple doesn’t have somebody with Jobs’ power to husband the product.

Tim Cook is not a product guy. He also doesn’t have somebody that can pitch a product like Steve Jobs did. Tim Cook doesn’t even like getting up in front of an audience. And, really, nobody else has Steve’s stature, and so that’s where Apple’s going to have some difficulty.

It’s not like they’re not going come up with great ideas. It’s just that making that idea magic, assuring that it’s done, making sure that it’s properly finished, and assuring that it is pitched to an audience in a way that will have them salivating to buy it….rhat’s the skill set that they have not replaced, and I still don’t think they recognize that they’ve really lost it.

And the end result is as we go into the fourth quarter I’m very concerned with Apple being able to maintain its very high numbers. Up until the fourth quarter, it can probably roll through on momentum.

I expect a new iPad this month, to do reasonably well. But, I do think we’re going notice dramatically, the way the product is presented, that it’s simply not going to have the magic that previous versions have had even though it’s going to be a lot better.

So, we kind of saw that with the iPhone 4S. It came to market and, because everybody was expecting the iPhone 5, it got very disappointing reviews even though it was substantially better. Largely, a brand new and redesigned phone from the iPhone 4. Much better.

But people just didn’t get quite as excited. They still eventually lined up and bought it in high numbers. But that’s the difference between momentum and somebody that’s actually driving the engine, and I think to a certain extent, while Apple is still running on momentum and a substantial amount of it, the fire and the boiler – if you want to use the old steam engine analogy – has significantly dampened with Jobs’ departure and unless they figure that out and light a fire underneath it, that train’s going to eventually slow.


  Click here to listen.


Private message OEM peers. Access all content.

For electronic OEM professionals working in OEM companies. Connect with OEM peers and access exclusive content.

View 1 comment

Comments

Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

TIP: Anyone can post article comments whether or not you are registered. But, if you register or log in you can attribute your posts to your user profile in GlobalNet Community.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*


*

You might also like:

EMS Factory Cost vs OEM Quote vs OEM Target Price

https://www.ventureoutsource.com/contract-manufacturing/rob-enderle-apple-tim-cook-ipad-foxconn-labor-rate-impact

Provider spotlight

About VentureOutsource.com

VentureOutsource.com is the leading online destination helping electronics OEM decision makers make more informed decisions and reduce risk. We offer educational Webinars, thousands of original articles and helpful tools, a community of influencers who understand the challenges facing your company today, and a comprehensive directory of electronics provider services.



Copyright Venture Outsource, LLC. All Rights Reserved
The material on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for legal, financial or professional advice. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our User Terms Agreement and by copyright law. By using our Website you agree to site Terms and Privacy policies. For questions please contact VentureOutsource.com at 1-888-860-1193 or visit www.ventureoutsource.com