Menu


Military EMS and printed circuit board security risks using global innovation networks

By Steve DeWaters

Imagine a GPGPU semiconductor is developed in the U.S. or Japan, and the attendant software and supporting components are developed in India. Then, a medical imaging platform is conceived in Germany and a complete system is built, tested, configured and shipped from China.

In recent years, the trend toward global outsourcing of R&D in the electronics supply chain has spurred both advantage and concern. For commercial players, the advent of R&D outsourcing has meant that product development can often be achieved with significant time and cost advantages through ‘Global Innovation Networks’ where countries with particular expertise contribute to an overall product development scheme.

But, for military and security companies, those same networks can pose great concerns for intellectual property (IP), data, platform, and ultimately warfighter security.

Specific countries and regions are becoming known for their expertise with concentrated R&D in electronics. Well-educated workforces, command of the English language, large and diverse populations, and low development costs mean these actors are increasingly attractive for foreign direct investments (FDI) by U.S. multi-nationals that are ‘setting up shop’ in situ.

India, for example, has quickly become a center-of-gravity for developing software and electronic hardware technologies; China has established itself as the premier developer of production technologies and is focused on mastering every other dimension of electronic interconnect; Europe has provided leading-edge automotive, medical, and automation technologies, and the U.S. leads the world in biotechnology, nanotechnology, and – together with Japan – semiconductors and photonics.

Find military ODM/design services
Go

Electronics providers in your search results will offer military electronics design services. You will be able to further target your options from the results page.

From the commercial perspective, a company can establish a working R&D presence through FDI in each geographic area and take advantage of the different competencies; effectively building a product across multiple borders, and meshing the results into one comprehensive product development scheme.

Imagine a GPGPU semiconductor is developed in the U.S. (or Japan) and the attendant software and supporting components are developed in India. Then, a medical imaging platform is conceived in Germany and a complete system is built, tested, configured and shipped from China. A company with R&D offices in each area, and that can effectively network and transfer – or stitch – the expertise across boundaries can potentially gain time, cost, and price advantages over competitors in electronics product development.

Now imagine that same semiconductor is a specialized chip for use in a directed energy weapon, perhaps to be used in counter-IED initiatives, and that the software coding for it is developed in India, the platform developed somewhere in Europe, and the product assembled and tested in China. And then it is shipped to one of the U.S. Military services for use in an active theater.

What do you suppose the chances are – despite the potential time/cost advantages or perhaps even the intellectual advantages – that somewhere along the way, the integrity of this weapon design will be compromised or aspects of it stolen? And to what extent is the warfighter potentially harmed by those chances?

Find military/defense manufacturers
Go

In your search results, you can further target additional End Markets and/or Services or Geographies.

If those questions sound accusatory or untrusting, they’re meant to be, because the answers to those questions are critically concerning, and become the reasons why the concept of a ‘trusted supply chain’ is of paramount importance to the military. The opportunities for tampering, theft, counterfeiting, and compromise are just too high when product development is outsourced to networks where historical, cultural, political and other motivations are at work beyond the basic interconnect.

For commercial products the potential risks of outsourcing R&D involve reverse engineering, patent infringements, and international litigation. For military applications, the risks are to national security, to the warfighter, and to the probability that critical military technology will end up in the hands of adversaries.

To be sure, R&D is absolutely critical to the competitive stance of the U.S. electronics industry. And to the extent that it is being outsourced as a means for knowledge, margin, or cost improvements, implies there is some merit to the model. The key however, is to assess which portions of the product supply chain cannot (or should not) be considered viable for R&D outsourcing.

For commercial products, it is a judgement call by OEM’s and EMS provider partners as to how much product development information is sensible to let into the ‘open’. For military products, judgement relies on the strictures of the U.S. Munitions List, the degrees of ITAR compliance and anti-counterfeiting competencies in the supply chain, and upon the demonstrated trust of that supply chain.

At the prime defense contractor level, there are also certain arrangements with international entities – such as with BAE Systems – where the U.S. government enters into a Special Security Agreement with the contractor and the relationship is scrutinized by the Defense Security Service.

Over the past two decades, R&D by EMS providers and printed circuit board manufacturers – as specific, devoted offerings – has largely been integrated into normal production schemes.

Today it is accepted practice to wait for an OEM to telegraph their need for developing certain technologies and then have the printed circuit board manufacturer or EMS provider invoice for the costs and ramp into a product development initiative.

In years prior, the reverse was more often true: Most printed circuit board manufacturers worth their salt had a dedicated R&D facility that specifically marketed to pursue and develop certain geometric, material, or processing technologies and OEM’s flocked to these ‘sand boxes’ as a means to solve interconnect problems.

But, R&D as standalone offerings fell victim to margin erosion from foreign competition, and printed circuit board manufacturers integrated R&D facilities with production environment, or shuttered.

The irony today is the same foreign competition is being used as nodes on global innovation networks to save margins.

The EMS industry has, by some contrast, devoted an average 1-2% of annual sales to flesh out new assembly techniques, inventory management systems, and logistics fulfillment concepts almost every year since the industry’s inception.

But, they too have looked to the global innovation networks model as a means for saving time and money.

Global innovation networks are an effective model for developing products and applications where the potential for knowledge, technology, and time / cost improvements eases the ability of an OEM to launch new products.

But, that model is not transferable to military applications without serious consequences.





Private message OEM peers. Access all content.

For electronic OEM professionals working in OEM companies. Connect with OEM peers and access exclusive content.

You might also like:

OEM Checklist for EMS Manufacturing Quotes

https://www.ventureoutsource.com/contract-manufacturing/military-ems-printed-circuit-board-security-risks-global-innovation-networks

Provider spotlight

About VentureOutsource.com

VentureOutsource.com is the leading online destination helping electronics OEM decision makers make more informed decisions and reduce risk. We offer educational Webinars, thousands of original articles and helpful tools, a community of influencers who understand the challenges facing your company today, and a comprehensive directory of electronics provider services.



Copyright Venture Outsource, LLC. All Rights Reserved
The material on this site is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for legal, financial or professional advice. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our User Terms Agreement and by copyright law. By using our Website you agree to site Terms and Privacy policies. For questions please contact VentureOutsource.com at 1-888-860-1193 or visit www.ventureoutsource.com